Starmer to hold talks with other global leaders this weekend to discuss response to Trump tariffs, No 10 says
Keir Starmer will be speaking to international leaders this weekend to discuss how they should respond to the Trump tariffs.
Speaking to journalists at the morning lobby briefing, the PM’s spokesperson would not give details of who the prime minister would be consulting, but he said the conversations were prompted by the need to work “even more closely” with allies in the light of what President Trump is doing.
The spokesperson said:
We are very much aware that the global economic landscape is shifting. It means we have a responsibility to work even more closely with other countries to maintain stability and strengthen our partnerships abroad.
And you’ll see the prime minister engaging with international leaders over the weekend on this.
The spokesperson also reminded reporters of what Starmer said yesterday, when he said the Trump tariffs were not “a short-term tactical exercise”, but the start of a “new era”.
Asked if Starmer favoured the sort of approach proposed by Jim O’Neill this morning – the non-US working together to deepen free trade, sidelining Washington (see 10.36am) – the spokesperson replied:
What the prime minister is concentrating on is his engagement with our global partners, and you will see evidence of that this weekend.
But, as we’ve said before, we will be maintaining a cool, headed and pragmatic approach, and one that is grounded in our national interest.
The spokesperson claimed government policies already in the pipeline showed that it was adapting to new circumstances. He said:
The global economic landscape is shifting and we need to shift with it. And, as you’ve already seen, through overhauling our planning system, bringing forward our industrial strategy and cutting excess red tape, we already embracing that new area and ready to tackle it.
The spokesperson also said the government would be “turbocharging” its work to deliver stability and created growth, and that Starmer would be saying more about this “in the coming days”.
Key events
Downing Street criticises Unite over its conduct in Birmingham bin strike, and urges it to negotiate settlement ‘in good faith’
Downing Street has criticised the Unite union for its conduct in the ongoing bin strike in Birmingham.
At the morning lobby briefing, the PM’s spokesperson defended the Labour-run council’s reorganisation plans that have led to the strike, and said it was time for the union to start negotiating “in good faith”.
Unite is one of the biggest unions affiliated to the Labour party, and a major donor. When Keir Starmer was asked about the ongoing bin strike at PMQs this week, he defended the council’s decision to declare the strike a major incident, but this is the first time the government has come out so strongly against the union.
Asked why the government was not intervening, the spokesperson said:
I think we should be clear about why this situation has come about.
Unite is striking against Birmingham city council’s decision to reform unfair staff structures that were a major cause of unequal pay claims and left the council liable to hundreds of millions of claims. This was a key factor cited in the council section 114 notice declaring bankruptcy.
Under the council’s current plans, no worker need lose any money. They’ve all been offered alternative employment at the same pay, for example, training to be an HGV driver or voluntary redundancy.
And the residents of Birmingham are our first and foremost priority.
As you will have seen, the local government minister Jim McMahon was in Birmingham yesterday meeting council leaders and commissioners to discuss the council’s response and make sure this has been gripped.
Following that meeting, police installed barriers at the picket line to prevent waste lorries being recklessly blocked from leaving the depots this morning to start dealing with the backlog.
Unite need to focus on negotiating in good faith, drop their opposition to changes needed to resolve long-standing pay issues and get round the table with the council to bring a strike to an end.
The spokesperson also said the strike was “causing misery and disruption to residents, which is why we are urgently pressing for an immediate agreement to be made”.
After visiting the council yesterday to discuss the strike, McMahon issued a statement saying:
Residents want this rubbish dealt with as soon as possible and I have made it clear in today’s meeting that we’re ready to support to improve conditions on the ground.
It is in the interest of all parties, and most importantly Birmingham’s residents, that this strike must be brought to a close with all parties redoubling efforts to get around the table and to find a resolution.
Starmer to hold talks with other global leaders this weekend to discuss response to Trump tariffs, No 10 says
Keir Starmer will be speaking to international leaders this weekend to discuss how they should respond to the Trump tariffs.
Speaking to journalists at the morning lobby briefing, the PM’s spokesperson would not give details of who the prime minister would be consulting, but he said the conversations were prompted by the need to work “even more closely” with allies in the light of what President Trump is doing.
The spokesperson said:
We are very much aware that the global economic landscape is shifting. It means we have a responsibility to work even more closely with other countries to maintain stability and strengthen our partnerships abroad.
And you’ll see the prime minister engaging with international leaders over the weekend on this.
The spokesperson also reminded reporters of what Starmer said yesterday, when he said the Trump tariffs were not “a short-term tactical exercise”, but the start of a “new era”.
Asked if Starmer favoured the sort of approach proposed by Jim O’Neill this morning – the non-US working together to deepen free trade, sidelining Washington (see 10.36am) – the spokesperson replied:
What the prime minister is concentrating on is his engagement with our global partners, and you will see evidence of that this weekend.
But, as we’ve said before, we will be maintaining a cool, headed and pragmatic approach, and one that is grounded in our national interest.
The spokesperson claimed government policies already in the pipeline showed that it was adapting to new circumstances. He said:
The global economic landscape is shifting and we need to shift with it. And, as you’ve already seen, through overhauling our planning system, bringing forward our industrial strategy and cutting excess red tape, we already embracing that new area and ready to tackle it.
The spokesperson also said the government would be “turbocharging” its work to deliver stability and created growth, and that Starmer would be saying more about this “in the coming days”.
No 10 confirms government ‘disappointed’ by US tariff policy, not ‘very happy’ as Trump claimed
Downing Street has refused to confirm President Trump’s claim that Keir Starmer was “very happy” about the treatment the UK is getting under the new US global tariff regime. (See 9.32am.) Asked about the president’s words at the morning lobby briefing, the PM’s spokesperson said that the government had already set out its position yesterday and that it was “disappointed” by the US tariff policy.
Livia Tossici-Bolt has been sentenced at Poole magistrates’ court to a conditional discharge for two years for two charges of breaching a “buffer zone” outside an abortion clinic in Bournemouth, PA Media reports. See 11.22am.
Labour has pulled 30,000 more children into poverty by not scrapping two-child benefit cap, charity says
Labour’s refusal to lift the two-child benefit cap has pulled 30,000 more children into poverty since the general election, the Child Poverty Action Group has said.
The charity published the calculation as Liz Kendall, the work and pensions secretary, said that she would regard it as a personal failure if child poverty is not falling by the time of the next general election.
Last week the Department for Work and Pensions published figures showing that 250,000 more people, including 50,000 more children, will be pushed into poverty by the sickness and disability benefit cuts announced in the spring statement.
Introduced by the Tories, the two-child cap means that parents do not get universal credit child allowance, or tax credits, for a third child born after April 2017.
The policy is seen by expert as a a major contributor to child poverty. Polling suggests voters favour the cap, but most Labour MPs want to see it scrapped, and many are disappointed that has not happened already.
In a news release, CPAG said that other interventions to reduce child povert would fail without the cap also being removed. It explained:
This is because as the two-child limit applies to third or subsequent children born after April 2017, it is effectively still being rolled out, with more and more children affected every day. This means the policy acts as a brake on any alternative steps government may take. The number of children affected by the policy will continue to increase until 2035 when the first children born under the two-child limit turn 18.
Every day 109 more children are pulled into poverty by the policy.
CPAG’s analysis finds that on the eighth anniversary of the two-child limit (Sunday 6 April), an estimated 30,000 more children will have been pulled into poverty by the policy since the government took office.
CPAG has published details of its analysis here.
In its manifesto Labour said it would “develop an ambitious strategy to reduce child poverty”. A child poverty taskforce has been set up by the government, and it is due to publish its strategy this spring.
In an interview with the i published today, Kendall refused to commit to lifting the two-child benefit cap. But she said:
We’ve got a clear manifesto commitment to tackle poverty and drive child poverty down and that is what we will deliver. Child poverty will be going down.
Asked if she would regard it as a personal failure if child poverty rates are rising at the time of the next election, she replied: “Yes.”
London mayor to get new powers to overrule councils that block pubs and clubs from opening late
London councils that block pubs and clubs from opening later could see their decisions overturned by the capital’s mayor, Sadiq Khan, under new powers from the government, PA Media reports. PA says:
Ministers are attempting to boost the hospitality industry by allowing the London mayor to “call in” licensing decisions for key nightlife areas in the capital.
The move could see bars open later and more al fresco dining in London and, if successful, could be extended to other parts of the country such as Greater Manchester or the West Midlands.
A source close to the mayor said: “Over recent years, London’s pubs, restaurants, clubs and music venues have been seen as a problem to be managed, rather than as a vital part of London’s economic and social scene. From al fresco dining, to late opening hours, to the impact of burdensome licensing conditions, we need to look at how we can support our venues, not work against them.”
There were three council byelections yesterday. Andrew Teale wrote a preview on his Substack blog. And here are the results, from Britain Elects. The Liberal Democrats won two seats from Labour, and Reform UK won one seat from the Lib Dems.
❗ Reform GAIN from Liberal Democrat
Sutton South East (St Helens) council by-election result:
REF: 44.5% (+44.5)
LAB: 36.3% (+0.7)
LDEM: 14.6% (-34.7)
CON: 4.6% (-10.5)+/- 2022
Estimated turnout: ~18% (-12)https://t.co/QSSdXxbUXt
— Britain Elects (@BritainElects) April 3, 2025
❗ Liberal Democrat GAIN from Labour
Park (Lincoln) council by-election result:
LDEM: 35.7% (+28.5)
LAB: 27.3% (-36.1)
REF: 17.6% (+17.6)
CON: 8.5% (-9.0)+/- 2023
Estimated turnout: ~17% (-3)https://t.co/QSSdXxbUXt
— Britain Elects (@BritainElects) April 3, 2025
❗ Liberal Democrat GAIN from Labour
Cwmllynfell and Ystalyfera (Neath Port Talbot) council by-election result:
LDEM: 34.0% (+34.0)
PC: 30.2% (-26.5)
REF: 13.3% (+13.3)
LAB: 12.7% (-30.6)
IND: 8.7% (+8.7)*Lab defence was of 2nd-placed seat in 2-member ward
+/- 2022…
— Britain Elects (@BritainElects) April 3, 2025
Anti-abortion campaigner cited by US state department as free speech case found guilty of breaching buffer zone law
An anti-abortion campaigner at the centre of a free speech controversy involving the US government has been found guilty of breaching a “buffer zone” outside a Bournemouth abortion clinic, PA Media reports. PA says:
Livia Tossici-Bolt was convicted at Poole magistrates’ court of two charges of breaching the Public Spaces Protection Order on two days in March 2023.
The case involved the 64-year-old from Bournemouth holding a sign saying “Here to talk, if you want”.
Her case was highlighted by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, & Labour (DRL), a bureau within the US Department of State, which posted a statement on X saying: “We are monitoring her case. It is important that the UK respect and protect freedom of expression.”
District Judge Orla Austin told the court of the defendant: “She lacks insight that her presence could have a detrimental effect on the women attending the clinic, their associates, staff and members of the public.”
She added: “I accept her beliefs were truly held beliefs. Although it’s accepted this defendant held pro-life views, it’s important to note this case is not about the rights and wrongs about abortion but about whether the defendant was in breach of the PSPO (Public Spaces Protection Order).”
Earlier this week the Telegraph reported a claim that US objections to this prosecution were holding up the proposed UK/US trade deal. But Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary, said this case was not part of the trade talks he was involved in.
UK and other G7 allies should sideline US by deepening their own free trade links, says former Treasury minister Jim O’Neill
Jim O’Neill, the former Goldman Sachs chief economist and former Treasury minister, has said Britain and other non-US G7 nations should respond to the Trump tariffs by deepening their own free trade links.
In an interview on the Today progamme, he said that it was perfectly feasible for leading nations still committed to free trade to in effect sideline the US, and trade more with each other.
O’Neill, who served as a Treasury minister in David Cameron’s government for a year and who is now a crossbench peer, said that G7 countries could take the lead in this, but that India and China should be included too.
He said the government was right to carry on talks with the US about a possible trade deal. But he went on:
But I think our approach should be to slightly stand back and think, what does Britain want, and can it get from the rest of the world, and what can we contribute?
And in that regard, it’s important to realise that the rest of the G7, except the US, collectively are the same size as the United States. And I would have thought a very sensible thing to be doing is having a serious conversation with the other members about actually lowering trade barriers between ourselves, especially for cross-border services, which is what the UK has a marginal advantage in, which would be very healthy for all of those countries because it’s the one area of global trade where most countries haven’t done enough in.
O’Neill said that the US was on a “kamikaze path” and that its tariffs were “rather insane”. But other countries had the clout to resist, he suggested.
Asked if it was possible to just ignore the US, he replied:
The US is the biggest economy in the world still, but it’s not anything like as important for global trade as it is in global finance and global security.
So if the US wants to do this [impose global tariffs], then it’s perfectly within the bounds of feasibility for other large economies to structure themselves, stop this addiction to the US consumer, and start to consume more themselves, as well as between each other.
O’Neill said, by turning his back on free trade, Trump was turning his back on “the major thing which has made the United States so prosperous over the last 40 to 50 or more years”. Other countries “shouldn’t get sucked into the same game”, he said, because overall, “whether it’s life expectancy or wealth”, the whole world has benefited from this model.
The Liberal Democrats and the Greens have both said Keir Starmer should respond to the Trump tariffs by strengthening economic links with countries like Canada and the EU. But Starmer has rejected this idea, saying it would be wrong to choose between being close to the US and being close to Europe.
Plan to increase access to NHS dentists in England ‘a complete failure’, MPs say
The official plan to increase access to NHS dental services in England has been a “complete failure”, and some of the government’s initiatives have worsened the crisis, a damning report warns, Andrew Gregory reports.
Lammy suggests Trump has taken US economic policy back almost 100 years with ‘return to protectionism’
David Lammy, the foreign secretary, is at the Nato HQ in Brussels this morning, where Nato foreign ministers are meeting. Speaking to the media, he said President Trump was taking US economic policy back almost a century by embracing protectionism. He said:
The United Kingdom, like France, is a great maritime nation.
We are a nation that believes in open trade, and I regret the return to protectionism in the United States, something that we’ve not seen for nearly a century.
As you know, we are consulting with business and industry. At this time, we are engaged in discussions with the United States to strike an economic agreement and an economic deal.
And of course, we have been absolutely clear that all options are on the table as we ensure the national interests of the British people, who will be very concerned at this time about how this affects the bottom line for them and their economic welfare.
We will put their national interest first, and it’s in their national interests to be negotiating with the United States an economic agreement at this time, but keeping all options on the table.
Minister won’t back Trump’s claim that Starmer ‘very happy’ about how UK affected by US global tariffs
Good morning. The British government, like the rest of the world, is still preoccupied with trying to absorb the consequences of Donald Trump’s decision to obliterate global free trade with a blizzard of tariffs. In London, the stock market has opened, and shares are still heading down. Graeme Wearden has the latest on that on his business live blog.
James Murray, a Treasury minister, has been giving interviews this morning. In terms of explaining the government’s policy, he did not say anything that went beyond what Keir Starmer and Jonathan Reynolds were saying yesterday. While not ruling out retaliatory tariffs, the government views them as a last resort and hopes that the trade deal it is negotiating with Washington will lead to the UK tariffs being reduced, or removed completely.
But Murray did have to answer a question about whether Donald Trump was right when he told reporters on Air Force One yesterday that Starmer was “very happy about how we treated them with tariffs”. It is rare to hear anyone from the UK government say anything negative about Trump in public, but even the ultra-loyalist, fourth-most-senior Treasury minister drew the line at pretending Trump was right about this. In response to the question, Murray told Times Radio:
We’re disappointed at tariffs being imposed globally. We are in a better position than many other economies moving forward because we’re on the lowest band of tariffs. But our focus is to get that economic deal.
There is not much formally in the diary today (parliament is not sitting), but politics never stops, and there is bound to be news, on the Trump tariffs and other matters. There will be a lobby briefing at 11.30am.
I’m afraid that, for the next few weeks or months, on most days staff shortages mean that comments will only be open on the blog between 10am and 3pm.
If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line, when comments are open, or message me on social media. I can’t read all the messages BTL, but if you put “Andrew” in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.
If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary.
I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.
